Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Struan's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Struan with semi consensus on the target. Star Mississippi 04:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Struan's

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed by anon, article has not been improved. My PROD rationale was "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." At best I can suggest redirecting this to The Asian Saga. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Literature. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems the best option, there isn't much sourcing that isn't fancruft. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Not enough coverage to justify passing the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Asian Saga - There's nothing much to merge, as the only content in the current article is primary sourced plot material. The actual company and Dirk Struan, the only member that currently has their own article, are both already mentioned at the target. Rorshacma (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I am also fine with the alternate suggestion below. Rorshacma (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: is it really best to redirect to The Asian Saga? I think people typing "Struans" into wikipedia search are more likely to be looking for something on the Struan disamb page. -- asilvering (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering Fair point. Add a disambig note there and move on? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:59, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus I think that's probably the best action, yeah. -- asilvering (talk) 19:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Struan, in agreement with Asilvering. Joyous! | Talk 20:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.